Careful document analysis,
prepared for attorney judgment.
Computational Forensics Group helps lawyers work through document-intensive matters with structured, source-cited analysis. We organize the record, surface relationships and inconsistencies, and deliver reports designed for careful attorney review.
Important matters often turn on details buried across thousands of pages.
A complex civil case might produce thousands of pages of depositions, hundreds of exhibits, and years of corporate records. Attorneys still need to understand the record; the challenge is doing that work with the care, coverage, and traceability the matter deserves.
Computational Forensics Group applies disciplined computational methods to organize, summarize, and cross-correlate that material. The result is not a substitute for legal judgment. It is a cited analytical foundation that helps lawyers review the record with confidence.
Pages of deposition testimony a single matter may produce — each requiring careful cross-reference against every exhibit and every other witness.
We analyze across the full document set, not just the materials that happen to be most familiar or easiest to search.
Analytical claims are tied back to the source record, with document, page, and line references where the source material allows.
A disciplined workflow from corpus intake to review-ready reports.
We establish the record
Depositions, exhibits, pleadings, corporate records, emails — we process the materials for the engagement and build a structured corpus with page-level organization.
We produce cited analytical work
We prepare summaries, claim maps, exhibit cross-references, timeline reconstructions, and inconsistency reports with supporting source references rather than unsupported conclusions.
Lawyers review and apply judgment
We deliver structured documents for attorney review, not final work product. Lawyers verify the citations, weigh the significance of the findings, and decide how they should affect the matter.
Matter-specific analysis for litigation and corporate lawyers.
Trial Support
We cross-index testimony, exhibits, and pleadings to help trial teams review the factual record with clearer structure and reliable source references.
Appellate Preparation
We reconstruct the record, organize citations by issue, and prepare factual foundations that appellate lawyers can verify and use while drafting.
Corporate Matters
For diligence, investigations, and disputes, we organize large corporate document sets and identify patterns, discrepancies, and key facts for attorney review.
Quality controls are part of the work, not an afterthought.
Computational analysis is useful only when lawyers can inspect it. Our process is designed to preserve citations, expose uncertainty, and keep analytical claims tied to the underlying record.
We do not ask attorneys to accept black-box output. We deliver work that can be checked, challenged, and incorporated only where lawyers find it sound.
Findings are connected to the documents that support them, with page and line references where available.
Outputs are reviewed through consistency checks that flag conflicts, missing support, and ambiguous signals before delivery.
The engagement is scoped around lawyers' questions, and the final judgment remains with lawyers.
Structured work product for attorney review.
For every matter
- Document corpus index keyed to specific pages and citations
- Witness-by-witness testimony summaries with exhibit cross-references
- Claim-level analysis keyed to pleadings or stated issues
- Chronological timeline drawn from the source record
- Potential inconsistencies with supporting citations
We do not produce
- Ready-to-file briefs or motions
- Legal conclusions or litigation strategy
- Expert opinions or sworn declarations
- Analysis that substitutes for attorney judgment
We assist lawyers with the factual and documentary record. We do not replace their professional responsibility for the matter.
Frequently asked questions
We work with depositions, trial transcripts, exhibits, pleadings, corporate records, emails, contracts, and most other document types that arise in civil litigation and corporate matters. We handle scanned PDFs, native PDFs, Word documents, and structured data exports.
Turnaround depends on corpus size, document condition, and the scope of analysis requested. We discuss timing at the outset and raise scope or quality issues before they affect delivery.
Yes. Documents are processed within isolated, matter-specific environments. We do not use client documents to train models or improve systems, and we establish appropriate confidentiality arrangements before document exchange.
No. We produce structured analysis designed for attorney review. The attorney reads our analysis, verifies the citations, applies legal judgment, and produces the final work product. Our work supports attorney analysis; it does not replace it.
Yes. We can begin an engagement at any stage — before deposition, after fact discovery, or at the appellate stage. We tailor the analysis to whatever the attorney needs at the stage of the matter.
Contact us through the engagement form. Tell us about the matter, the document corpus, and the analysis you need. We will respond with appropriate next steps for scoping the engagement.
Discuss a document-intensive matter.
Every matter is different, and every attorney's needs are different. Contact us for a complimentary discussion about the record, the work ahead, and how we may be able to help.